Panama vs Uruguay tax rates at a glance
| Tax | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama | ๐บ๐พ Uruguay |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax |
|
|
| Corporate tax |
|
|
| Capital gains tax |
|
|
| Dividend tax |
|
|
| Wealth tax |
|
|
| Inheritance / estate tax |
|
|
| VAT / GST / sales tax |
|
|
| Standard VAT / ITBMS |
|
|
| Territorial treatment |
|
|
| Tax | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama | ๐บ๐พ Uruguay |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax |
|
|
| Corporate tax |
|
|
| Capital gains tax |
|
|
| Dividend tax |
|
|
| Wealth tax |
|
|
| Inheritance / estate tax |
|
|
| VAT / GST / sales tax |
|
|
| Standard VAT / ITBMS |
|
|
| Territorial treatment |
|
|
Panama's territorial system is usually better for ordinary foreign-source income; specified passive income of multinational-group entities has a separate economic-substance regime.
Both have a 25% standard corporate tax headline, though scope and incentives differ.
Panama's standard 10% capital gains tax is often below Uruguay's 12% tax on capital income.
Panama's 7% ITBMS is far below Uruguay's 22% VAT.
Uruguay is stronger for stability, family life and institutional credibility.
Panama usually wins for mobile foreign-source income. Its territorial system generally leaves ordinary foreign-source income outside the local tax net, subject to the economic-substance regime for specified passive income of multinational-group entities. Its 7% ITBMS rate is far lower than Uruguay's 22% VAT.
Uruguay is not the cheapest option, but it is often the more comfortable long-term residence base. It has a stronger reputation for stability, a developed legal system and useful planning for new residents, especially where the limited foreign movable-capital-income election is available and the expanded 2026 foreign investment-income rules are handled correctly.
Choose Panama if your income is mostly foreign-source and you want a lower tax footprint. Choose Uruguay if family residence quality, institutions and long-term stability matter more than headline rates.
Panama and Uruguay are both territorial-leaning, but Panama is the lower-tax play. Uruguay is the stability play.
Panama is usually better for foreign-source income and lower indirect tax. Uruguay can be better for people who prioritise residence quality, stability and a more institutional long-term base.
Panama generally taxes Panama-source income and leaves ordinary foreign-source income outside the local tax base. Law 926 of 2026 adds an economic-substance regime for specified passive foreign income of multinational-group entities.
No. Uruguay has corporate tax, VAT, personal income tax and a wealth tax. From 2026, its foreign investment-income rules cover additional foreign movable and immovable capital income and gains; a new resident may have a limited election for certain foreign movable capital income.