Panama vs Paraguay tax rates at a glance
| Tax | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama | ๐ต๐พ Paraguay |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax |
|
|
| Corporate tax |
|
|
| Capital gains tax |
|
|
| Dividend tax |
|
|
| Wealth tax |
|
|
| Inheritance / estate tax |
|
|
| VAT / GST / sales tax |
|
|
| Standard VAT / ITBMS |
|
|
| Standard corporate headline |
|
|
| Tax | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama | ๐ต๐พ Paraguay |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax |
|
|
| Corporate tax |
|
|
| Capital gains tax |
|
|
| Dividend tax |
|
|
| Wealth tax |
|
|
| Inheritance / estate tax |
|
|
| VAT / GST / sales tax |
|
|
| Standard VAT / ITBMS |
|
|
| Standard corporate headline |
|
|
Panama generally excludes ordinary foreign-source income; specified passive income of multinational-group entities has a separate economic-substance regime.
Paraguay's 10% corporate tax is far below Panama's 25% rate on Panama-source profits.
Paraguay is usually lower for ordinary taxable gains, while Panama commonly uses a 10% capital gains rate.
Panama's 7% ITBMS is lower than Paraguay's 10% VAT.
Panama is usually stronger for ordinary foreign-source income planning, subject to the multinational passive-income rules.
Panama wins when the income is genuinely foreign-source. Its territorial system generally taxes Panama-source income and leaves ordinary foreign income outside the local net. Specified passive foreign income of multinational-group entities is subject to a separate economic-substance regime, which is why the ordinary territorial treatment must be read with that exception in mind.
Paraguay wins when the business is local or profits are taxable onshore. Its 10% corporate tax and 10% VAT are lower than Panama's 25% corporate tax and 7% ITBMS only on the VAT side, and the overall rate stack is simpler for many operating businesses.
The decision rule is clean: choose Panama for foreign-source income and territorial planning; choose Paraguay for low ordinary rates on local income, company profits and day-to-day operations.
Panama and Paraguay are both attractive in Latin America, but for different reasons. Panama is the foreign-source income play; Paraguay is the low-local-rate play.
Panama is usually better for foreign-source income and territorial personal planning. Paraguay is usually better for lower local corporate tax, lower ordinary rates and local operating businesses.
Generally, Panama taxes Panama-source income rather than ordinary foreign-source income. However, Law 926 of 2026 applies an economic-substance regime to specified passive foreign income of multinational-group entities; classification and documentation still matter.
Paraguay's standard corporate income tax rate is generally 10%, with separate dividend and withholding rules depending on the payment.